<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>&#039;Pataphysical science in the home &#187; semantic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.luna-park.com/blog/tag/semantic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.luna-park.com/blog</link>
	<description>&#160;&#160;Plasticine-mediated posts, mostly. By Howard Liptzin, totally.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.luna-park.com/blog/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='www.luna-park.com' port='80' path='/blog/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>DWIW</title>
		<link>http://www.luna-park.com/blog/2009/05/18/dwiw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.luna-park.com/blog/2009/05/18/dwiw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[macroblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luna-park.com/blog/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The holy grail of human-computer interface design must be the DWIW function. I communicate with the machine and the machine just Does What I Want. I was thinking about this after having played around with Wolfram Alpha. Actually what sparked this post was having seen so many tweets about it mistaking it for a search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The holy grail of human-computer interface design must be the DWIW function. I communicate with the machine and the machine just <strong>D</strong>oes <strong>W</strong>hat <strong>I</strong> <strong>W</strong>ant.</p>
<div id="attachment_107" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-107" title="keyboard" src="http://www.luna-park.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/keyboard.gif" alt="Do what I want!" width="200" height="143" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Do what I want!</p></div>
<p>I was thinking about this after having played around with <a title="Link to wolfram alpha" href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/" target="_self">Wolfram Alpha</a>. Actually what sparked this post was having seen <a title="Live Twitter search, so my point may degrade over time." href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%22Wolfram%20Alpha" target="_self">so many tweets about it</a> mistaking it for a search engine. The tagline of Wolfram Alpha is &#8220;computational knowledge engine&#8221;, not something like &#8220;find what you are looking for&#8221; or &#8220;let me find that for you?&#8221;</p>
<p>But people don&#8217;t read taglines very carefully and when they do they don&#8217;t think about them too seriously. They use past experience to parse the service and charge ahead accordingly.</p>
<p>In trying to keep it simple, and to develop a more natural language approach to the input field, the designers of the interface present a single text entry field followed by the plus sign <span style="color: #999999;">[</span><strong>=</strong><span style="color: #999999;">]</span> to communicate <em>put your input here, click to see what we can compute from that.</em></p>
<p>The problem is that most people associate a plain input field with a submit button as = Google, not a computational knowledge engine. If you scan complaining tweets you will notice that the authors hit the <span style="color: #999999;">[</span><strong>=</strong><span style="color: #999999;">]<span style="color: #000000;"> with a DWIW intention, expecting a search result, not </span></span>computational knowledge.</p>
<p>We are living in the pre-dawn of a new age of human-computer interaction. Eventually we will get to the point at which a single input field (with textual, audio or even electro-neurological input) will  be semantically, behaviorally and contextually (time, place, device) aware — getting us that much closer to a true DWIW command. This will require a lot of groundwork, but seeing as though folks like Wolfram, <a title="Tim Berners-Lee 2009 TED presentation on Linked Data" href="http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_on_the_next_web.html" target="_self">Tim Berners-Lee</a> and an army of others are on the case, I expect to see really cool developments becoming more commonplace over the next 5-20 years <img src='http://www.luna-park.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><object width="446" height="326" data="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/embed/TimBerners-Lee_2009-embed_high.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/TimBerners-Lee-2009.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=484" /><param name="src" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.luna-park.com/blog/2009/05/18/dwiw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
